The Minutes Controversy 1770-1777

 

Historical Setting

In 1739 theological differences over election and predestination became public between John and Charles Wesley and George Whitefield. It led to a sharp breach in 1741, though on a personal level the Wesleys and Whitefield remained friends and colleagues. This became known as the Free Grace Controversy. Then from 1756 to 1766 John Wesley was embroiled in controversy with the Methodist Calvinist James Hervey and his supporters over the imputed righteousness of Christ. To clarify his position Wesley published his landmark sermon The Lord Our Righteousness (1765). This proved to be a precursor of the Minutes Controversy.

Whitefield died in 1770, the same year John Wesley published statements in the annual Conference Minutes regarding the relationship between faith, good works, and justification that Calvinists took as espousing justification by works. John Wesley’s central point is expressed in the following quote, “Every believer, till he comes to glory, works for, as well as from life.” To see what he meant by this statement, read the tract listed below: The 1770 Conference Minutes. A pamphlet war between the Arminians and Calvinists ensued for several years that involved a number of people on both sides. The controversy led John Wesley to begin publishing the Arminian Magazine in 1778 to counter Calvinism. In 1785, he published the sermon On Working Out Our Own Salvation as his settled statement on the role of works in salvation.

The Minutes Controversy focused on the role of works in the process of salvation, but behind it were the continual tensions between the Wesleyans and the Calvinists over the order of salvation (ordo salutis) and core theological principles: election (conditional vs unconditional), predestination (divine foreknowledge vs divine decree), grace (prevenient vs irresistible), justification (degrees, imputation, & single vs double), perseverance (apostasy possible vs eternal security), and sanctification (Christian perfection vs perpetual sinner). In many ways, the Controversy was a conflict between two theological systems within a common evangelical tradition. These two traditions continue to exist down to our own day. By studying the Minutes Controversy we can hopefully gain a better understanding of how these two traditions took shape at the beginning of the evangelical movement and continue to influence the evangelical faith today.

Secondary Resources

W. Stephen Gunter, The Limits of Love Divine. Kingswood Books, 1989.
J. Russell Frazier, True Christianity: Doctrine of Dispensations in the Thought of John W. Fletcher. Pickwick, 2014.
Henry Rack, Reasonable Enthusiast, 3rd ed. Epworth Press, 2002, pp. 450-470. 
Henry Rack, ed. Works of John Wesley: The Minutes of Conference, vol. 10. Abingdon Press, 2011.

Meet the Wesleyan Methodists


John Wesley 1703-1791

John was the primary founder and undisputed leader of Methodism. He was an Anglican high churchman converted to the evangelical faith in 1738 at Aldersgate. WEsley was a lifelong opponent of Calvinism have been raised in a parsonage that espoused Anglican Arminianism. Wesley began to publicly confront Calvinism in 1739 with his sermon on Free Grace. His remarks on Calvinism and salvation at the 1770 Annual Conference infuriated the Calvinists, which officially sparked the Minutes Controversy.

Charles Wesley 1707-1788
Charles was the other primary founder of Methodism and is remembered most for his thousands of hymns. Like his brother John, Charles was nurtured in the Anglican Arminian tradition from early childhood. And, like his older brother, Charles was an Anglican high churchman who converted to the evangelical faith in 1738. Charles was minimally involved in the Minutes Controversy.

John Fletcher 1729-1785
Fletcher was an Anglican priest and was a key participant in the controversy. Born in Switzerland, Fletcher came to England around 1749/1750 and became an ordained minister in the Church of England. He became associated with the Wesleys in the mid-1750s. Fletcher deserves the title as Methodism’s first theologian for his Five Checks Against Antinomianism and other writings during the Minutes Controversy. He stood by John Wesley and defended the 1770 Conference Minutes.

Walter Sellon 1715-1792
Sellon was an Anglican clergyman of Huguenot descent. Before his ordination he was a baker and a local preacher having met John Wesley in 1745. He taught at Kingswood School from 1748 to 1750. In the late 1760s Sellon began to publish writings in support of the Arminian cause and joined in the fray of the Controversy at its beginning.


Thomas Olivers
1725-1799
Olivers was a Welsh Methodist preacher and hymn writer. He translated the Hebrew hymn The God of Abraham Praise after hearing it chanted in the Great Synagogue of London. He played a minor role in the Controversy.

 

Meet the Calvinistic Methodists

Augustus Toplady 1740-1778
Toplady was an Anglican minister, a well-known hymn-writer (Rock of Ages), and a committed Calvinist. He was spiritually awakened in 1755 and converted three years later in 1758. He initially was Arminian in theology, but following his graduation from Trinity College 1760, Toplady become acquainted with prominent Calvinists George Whitefield, John Gill, and William Romaine. His relationship with John Wesley was cordial but soured during the Minutes Controversy.

Walter Shirley 1725-1786
Shirley was an Anglican minister, hymn-writer, and a first cousin of the Countess of Huntingdon. He ignited the controversy with a circular letter inviting other Anglican clergy and laity to oppose John Wesley’s teachings in the 1770 Conference Minutes, which drew a response from Wesley’s colleague John Fletcher (First Check to Antinomianism).

Rowland Hill 1744-1833
Hill was a popular English preacher, enthusiastic Calvinist evangelical, and an advocate for the smallpox vaccination. He was founder and resident pastor of an independent chapel, the Surrey Chapel, London. Hill was a friend of the Countess of Huntingdon.


Richard Hill 1732-1808

Hill was the oldest son of Sir Rowland Hill and a Baronet. He distinguished himself as a champion of George Whitefield and of the Calvinistic Methodists. When six students were expelled from Edmund Hall, Oxford, for adopting Methodism, Hill sharply criticized the university authorities in the tract, Pietas Oxoniensis. In 1771 he joined the Minutes Controversy and become one of the most vocal opponents of John Wesley and John Fletcher.


John Berridge   1716-1793
Berridge was an evangelical Anglican clergyman and hymnist. Converted in 1757, Berridge became a very popular preacher to the ire of the mainstream clergy of the Established Church. He faced much opposition through most of his ministry. He played a minor role in the controversy.

Documents of the Controversy

Here, for the first time, are all the published writings in their chronological order and grouped according to their theological position. The earliest possible edition is posted. A few writings are unavailable at present and are listed in regular font. These writings are listed so the reader is aware of them. We begin with the year 1769 as the first stirrings of the controversy began in that year. The following list is taken from Stephen Gunter’s The Limits of Love Divine, pp. 277-79.

1769

Wesleyan Methodists
Sellon Doctrine of General Redemption & Arguments Against It Answered

Calvinistic Methodists
Toplady Church of England Vindicated from Arminianism
Toplady Doctrine of Absolute Predestination Stated
Toplady Doctrine of Absolute Predestination Asserted with Discourse on Divine Attributes

1770

Wesleyan Methodists
J Wesley Question, What is Arminian? Answered
1770 Annual Conference Minutes
Olivers Letter to Mr Toplady

Calvinistic Methodists
Toplady Letter to Wesley
Toplady Letter to Rev John Wesley
Toplady Caveat Against Unsound Doctrines

1771

Wesleyan Methodists
C Wesley Elegy for Whitefield
Sellon Church of England Vindicated Absolute Predestination 1771

J Wesley A Defence of the Minutes of (the 1770) Conference
Fletcher First Check to Antinomianism
Olivers Letter to Toplady
Olivers Letter to Mr Toplady
Fletcher Second Check to Antinomianism
J Wesley The Consequence Proved

Calvinistic Methodists
Shirley Narrative of JW’s Late Conference
R Hill Conversation Between Hill Maddan Walsh

1772

Wesleyan Methodists
Fletcher Scriptural Election Asserted, Calvinian Election Disproved (unpublished)
J Wesley Some Remarks on Hill’s Review of JW’s Doctrines
Fletcher Third Check to Antinomianism
Fletcher Appeal to Matter of Fact & Common Sense
Fletcher Fourth Check to Antinomianism

Calvinistic Methodists
R Hill Five Letters to J Fletcher
R Hill Review of Wesley’s Doctrines – Minutes Controversy
Row. Hill Friendly Remarks on Spirit & Doctrines
Row. Hill A Farrago of Hot and Cold Medicines
R Hill Some Remarks on Fletcher’s Third Check
Toplady More Work for John Wesley

1773

Wesleyan Methodists
J Wesley Remarks Mr Hill’s Farrago
Fletcher Fifth Check to Antinomianism Pt One

Calvinistic Methodists
R Hill Logica Wesleiensis
R Hill Finishing Stroke against Fletcher’s 4th Check
Berridge Christian World Unmasked

1774

Wesleyan Methodists
Fletcher Fifth Check to Antinomianism Part Two
Fletcher Equal Check to Pharisaism & Antinomianism First Part
Fletcher Equal Check Scripture Scales Part One
Olivers Scourge to Calumny
J Wesley Thoughts on Necessity
J. Wesley abridgment of First Part of an Equal Check

Calvinistic Methodists
R Hill A Creed for Arminians & Perfectionists
R Hill Three Letters & Arminian-Perfectionists Creed
R Hill Three Letters to John Fletcher Declining Further Controversy
Toplady Free-Will & Merit Fairly Examined
Toplady Freewill & Merit Examined
Toplady Historic Proof of Calvinism English Church vol 1
Toplady Historic Proof of Calvinism English Church vol 2

1775

Wesleyan Methodists
Fletcher Fictitious & Genuine Creed
Fletcher Equal Check Scripture Scales Part Two
Fletcher Last Check to Antinomianism

Calvinistic Methodists
Toplady Good News from Heaven
Toplady Scheme Christian & Philosophical Necessity Asserted

1776

Wesleyan Methodists
Fletcher Answer to Toplady’s Vindication of Decrees

1777

Wesleyan Methodists
Fletcher Reply to Toplady’s Scheme of Philosophical Necessity
Fletcher Doctrines Grace & Justice
Fletcher Reconciliation – Unite the People of God Pt. 1
Fletcher Reconciliation – Unite the People of God Pt. 2

Fletcher Bible Arminianism & Bible Calvinism
J Wesley Thoughts on Gods Sovereignty
J Wesley Answer to Rowland Hill Imposter Detected

Calvinistic Methodists
Row Hill Imposture Detected & Dead Vindicated

1778

John Wesley begins to publish The Arminian Magazine to counter Calvinism.
1778 vol 1
1780 vol 3
1781 vol 4
1782 Vol 5
1783 vol 6
1786 vol 9
1787 vol 10
1788 vol 11
1789 vol 12
1790 vol 13

Digital copies can be accessed at Hathi Trust Digital Library